The state I'm requesting advice for is Alaska.

I have been recently notified that I have been identified in a civil personal injury claim against another person as a "surrogate" for that person. I am NOT named as a defendant. (My pockets are too empty!)

The woman who has initiated this suit did so in January of 2007 after receiving a warning from police to cease and desist accusing me of crimes in October 2006. She has supplemented her complaint twice and I don't know when she specifically began alluding to me as a criminal in her complaints.
In her lawsuit, she claims that I am both a drug user and dealer and that the party she is suing "used me to harass her to the point where she suffered personal injury."
I left the state of Alaska in 2008 to get away from this woman. I thought the matter settled inasmuch as she did not personally bother me for a full year after receiving the police warning. It is quite possible that she began referring to me in this way only after I left the state and no one could locate me.
The person she is suing doesn't really know me, I appeared as a witness for one of his clients. He didn't know how to contact me, and only found me through a Google search in May of this year.
In my mind, this is clearly a case of witness intimidation/tampering as the complainant would know that the defendant call upon me to testify as to the truth of her claims.
Communication with the defendant is sketchy at best. I am waiting to hear from him as to exactly when the complainant added these untrue claims about me. (she has supplemented her complaint twice)
Doesn't the "Discovery rule" apply? With not being named specifically in the suit, I would have no knowledge of what it contained unless and until I was contacted by the defendant or unless I went to the courthouse and did the research myself, which I did not.

Should I notify the local police there of the matter? I am very tired of being slandered, but have no intention of suing her (can't sue over what's said in court anyway, right?). I would like to put an end to her using me as a pawn in her little legal games. She has named me as a "surrogate" for 4 separate parties in the last 5 years, but this is the first time she has alluded to me being a criminal. She lost all the other cases, because the courts could not find a "motive" for me to act for the defendants.

Perhaps you are thinking "So what, you are 5000 miles away!" True, but without exposing the truth for what it is, my testimony is tainted by her insinuations from the get-go, and makes her claims of "surrogacy" appear more legitimate.

So, is this considered witness intimidation/tampering or something along those lines and is there anything I can do? I know that perjury, witness tampering, etc., are generally only pursued in criminal cases, but the law is the law, and the statutes say nothing about criminal law only, so if I can address this to an authority, I have that leverage to work with.

Both parties are appearing pro se.